This blog post is
11 years old! Most likely, its content is outdated.
Especially if it's technical.
I booked an appointment for a computer repair today and there was a reference number and summary that I was told to print two copies of. One to go with the computer and one to keep myself as a reference. The page was one page long. So, in Firefox I clicked to print two copies. Our printer here at work is one of those that prints on both pages and that's where the problem lies. It printed the two copies one of each side. So only one piece of physical paper. Totally stupid.
I don't know what or who to blame for this. Is it my Firefox? My Dell printer? My Linux printer drivers? Surely there was a chance for someone working on this some time ago who chose not to think for a moment.
- Previous:
- rfc822() vs. rfc1123_date()
16 August 2007
- Next:
- Proud to be a Swedish atheist
29 August 2007
- Related by Keyword:
- Another win for Tracking Protection in Firefox
13 December 2017
- Getting uploadify to work
17 July 2009
- The importance of checking in Firefox
07 July 2008
- Tip: Printer friendly pages with Page Templates in Zope
24 March 2008
- Future of Web Apps (quick summary and thoughts)
04 October 2007
- Related by Text:
- Be very careful with your add_header in Nginx! You might make your site insecure
11 February 2018
- jQuery and Highslide JS
08 January 2008
- I'm back! Peterbe.com has been renewed
05 June 2005
- Anti-McCain propaganda videos
12 August 2008
- I'm Prolog
01 May 2007
I booked an appointment for a computer repair today and there was a reference number and summary that I was told to print two copies of. One to go with the computer and one to keep myself as a reference. The page was one page long. So, in Firefox I clicked to print two copies. Our printer here at work is one of those that prints on both pages and that's where the problem lies. It printed the two copies one of each side. So only one piece of physical paper. Totally stupid.