This blog post is 11 years old! Most likely, its content is outdated. Especially if it's technical.
I booked an appointment for a computer repair today and there was a reference number and summary that I was told to print two copies of. One to go with the computer and one to keep myself as a reference. The page was one page long. So, in Firefox I clicked to print two copies. Our printer here at work is one of those that prints on both pages and that's where the problem lies. It printed the two copies one of each side. So only one piece of physical paper. Totally stupid.
I don't know what or who to blame for this. Is it my Firefox? My Dell printer? My Linux printer drivers? Surely there was a chance for someone working on this some time ago who chose not to think for a moment.
- Previous:
- rfc822() vs. rfc1123_date() 16 August 2007
- Next:
- Proud to be a Swedish atheist 29 August 2007
- Related by Keyword:
- Another win for Tracking Protection in Firefox 13 December 2017
- Getting uploadify to work 17 July 2009
-
The importance of checking in Firefox 07 July 2008
- Tip: Printer friendly pages with Page Templates in Zope 24 March 2008
- Future of Web Apps (quick summary and thoughts) 04 October 2007
- Related by Text:
- jQuery and Highslide JS 08 January 2008
- I'm back! Peterbe.com has been renewed 05 June 2005
- Anti-McCain propaganda videos 12 August 2008
- Ever wondered how much $87 Billion is? 04 November 2003
- Guake, not Yakuake or Yeahconsole 23 January 2010
I booked an appointment for a computer repair today and there was a reference number and summary that I was told to print two copies of. One to go with the computer and one to keep myself as a reference. The page was one page long. So, in Firefox I clicked to print two copies. Our printer here at work is one of those that prints on both pages and that's where the problem lies. It printed the two copies one of each side. So only one piece of physical paper. Totally stupid.