Comment

Dontneedmyname

Russo, for all your wailing about Zeitgeist debunked being "repressed"...

I read that page, you're seriously telling me I'm supposed to take a guy's argument, with a littany of spelling errors in modern English, at face value on ancient history?!?

He spelled "crucifixion" as "crucixion"...actually he spelled it both ways in back-to-back sentences (meaning he didn't even so much as verify with bloody spell-check), let alone other properly spelled words that are still obviously incorrect (like "is" instead of "us" etc).

...that cited source is SO solid you can rest your junk on it. Likely all it's good for - I noticed it reading out of curiosity's sake/shits & giggles. They didn't notice it writing about their own religion, area of "professional expertise" &, one would think, a subject material that OUGHT to be considered rather important & of some significance to the author.

If my whimsy noticed, why not their heart-felt research & editing? They can't even proofread but I'm supposed to believe they verified/debunked all this?!?

BIG surprise they assert these other religions "very likely" copied Christianity themselves. Totally NOT written by a fanatic at all~