For the performance interested jQuery users please check out this thread
For the impatient, read Stephens reply He benchmarked what I asked and concluded that
$("p", $("#foo")) is much faster in jQuery 1.3.2. I've been coding this style in jQuery for all recent projects so I'm happy with this outcome.
John Resig himself joined in on the discussion and had this to say:
"You should always use $("#foo").find("p") in favor of $("p", $("#foo")) - the second one ends up executing $(...) 3 times total - only to arrive at the same result as doing $("#foo").find("p")."
Not only did John join in on the discussion but it also made him work on jQuery 1.3.3 (not yet released at the time of writing) so that it doesn't matter which format you use you get the same performance. See the benchmark here
- Propeller Island City Lodge Orange Room 23 February 2009
- Sandisk SSD v/s HDD 04 March 2009
- Related by category:
- Related by keyword:
Fastest way to uniqify a list in Python 14 August 2006
- Django ORM optimization story on selecting the least possible 22 February 2019
- How to do performance micro benchmarks in Python 24 June 2017
- Difference between $.data('foo') and $.attr('data-foo') in jQuery 10 June 2012
- The ideal number of workers in Jest 08 October 2018