Yeah, you got "hackernewsed" today, so I didn't notice the old dates.
The uwsgi module in Nginx wasn't what I was discussing though, I still think that actually deploying a uWSGI container, although easy for simple cases, is still a bit complicated to do for heavy traffic sites, or on UNIX sockets.
Sorry Derek, but this comparation is very old. Now the uwsgi module is included in nginx by default (as Cherokee) and a lot of documentation has been rewritten, with a section dedicated to examples contributed by users.
http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Example
During the last 6 months the project has evolved a lot. Yes it is not simple to configure as a SIMPLE wsgi-only server, but there is a lot of works going on on this area, performance are increasing after every release (yes there are still space for optimizations) and memory usage is lower
than every competitor. Documentation is surely not of high quality (contributions are wellcomed), but in the mailing-list we are always ready to help people.
Comment
Yeah, you got "hackernewsed" today, so I didn't notice the old dates.
The uwsgi module in Nginx wasn't what I was discussing though, I still think that actually deploying a uWSGI container, although easy for simple cases, is still a bit complicated to do for heavy traffic sites, or on UNIX sockets.
Parent comment
Sorry Derek, but this comparation is very old. Now the uwsgi module is included in nginx by default (as Cherokee) and a lot of documentation has been rewritten, with a section dedicated to examples contributed by users. http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Example During the last 6 months the project has evolved a lot. Yes it is not simple to configure as a SIMPLE wsgi-only server, but there is a lot of works going on on this area, performance are increasing after every release (yes there are still space for optimizations) and memory usage is lower than every competitor. Documentation is surely not of high quality (contributions are wellcomed), but in the mailing-list we are always ready to help people.