This blog post is 15 years old! Most likely, its content is outdated. Especially if it's technical.
This is an article about a group of developers who had a task to do but hadn't chosen what programming language to use. The alternatives they had to choose from were C, PHP, Perl, Java and Python; and the requirements where these:
- We planned to prototype on a remote device and anticipated numerous changes. We needed a language that was designed with change in mind.
- We wanted to avoid the added step of code compilation in order to minimize the overhead associated with a change. An interpreted language seemed pragmatic.
- We wanted a language with good introspection capability.
- We needed to do a lot of string manipulation and file I/O. Whatever language we chose had to excel in both of these areas.
It's so suited for Python that it almost sounds as if they wrote the requirements after the choice. But that's just how Python is.
- Previous:
- Moscow Metro 01 December 2003
- Next:
- Mr. Picassohead 03 December 2003
- Related by Keyword:
- Django vs. Java 25 October 2008
- Vista voice recognition and Perl 09 February 2007
- Zope compared to PHP 22 June 2005
- Integer division in programming languages 04 August 2004
- He must really hate C 17 March 2004
- Related by Text:
- jQuery and Highslide JS 08 January 2008
- I'm back! Peterbe.com has been renewed 05 June 2005
- Anti-McCain propaganda videos 12 August 2008
- Ever wondered how much $87 Billion is? 04 November 2003
- Guake, not Yakuake or Yeahconsole 23 January 2010
