Comment

Sven Berkvens-Matthijsse

The (small) disadvantage over Mike Watkins' version when compared to Dave Kirby's version is that Mike's version walks the given sequence twice. That means that it cannot be a generator, while Dave's version will handle generators just fine.

Parent comment

Mike Watkins

The coffee-corrected return for f13 (above) should be: return [item for item in seq if item in uniq and not uniq.remove(item)] Essentially the inverse of Dave Kirby's approach but just a hair faster for whatever reason set() only knows.