What's so bad about HTML guys?

20 March 2004   2 comments   Web development


Mind That Age!

This blog post is 13 years old! Most likely, its content is outdated. Especially if it's technical.

Powered by Fusion×

Swedish 99Kronor.com decides to ignore the power of HTML completely. Their website is just one huge image with an image-map for the links. That one image is heavy to download and takes 15 seconds to download on a 56K modem according to Web Page Speed Report. This is considerable more than a few of their competitors I looked at as well.

The biggest problem is on the other hand that the pages are completely in accessible on basic browsers like mobile phone or PDAs. Blind or visually impaired people might as well give up on it. Not to mention the hassle in the future when they want to redesign things or change the content.

Follow @peterbe on Twitter


hmm, you are complaining about 99kronor.com's "one huge image with an image-map for the links".
Look who's talking now. Come on, your site also loads very slow. Klicking at your links makes the browser to load the page again.
I belive 99kronor's gole is to serve their customers first, with great features, instead of a "flashy" website.
My page loads slow because I have chosen to use many images to enrich the experience. Besides, this server is running on a home broadband connection 256Kbits/sec on an low-RAM Celeron 700 laptop!
Thank you for posting a comment

Your email will never ever be published

Related posts

He must really hate C 17 March 2004
Google PageRank algorithm in Python 21 March 2004
Related by Keyword:
Accessible Pop-Up script 08 June 2004
Related by Text:
To enable Tracking Protection for performance 01 November 2017
Ultrafast loading of CSS 01 September 2017
JetBlue a good and bad website 22 February 2007
Lazy loading below the fold 26 October 2013
How I deal with deferred image loading in Javascript 08 June 2012