
Do you train Kung Fu?
Or know someone who does?
Then check out KungFuPeople.com
Mobile version of this page
Previous:
Ugly one-liner to debug an object in Zope
Next:
Python Cookbook arrived
Ugly one-liner to debug an object in Zope
Next:
Python Cookbook arrived
Related by category
callable Python objects
http://docs.python.org/lib/built-in-funcs.html2nd of April 2005
Python gurus are going to laugh at me for this one but I learnt it today; how to check if an object is callable. Before this I thought I was clever with this:
>>> def foo(): return "s"
>>> hasattr(foo, '__call__')
True
>>> hasattr(foo(), '__call__')
False
>>> hasattr(foo, '__call__')
True
>>> hasattr(foo(), '__call__')
False
But there was an easier way. I discovered this by accident and looked it up in the documentation after. Use the builtin function called 'callable()':
>>> def foo(): return "s"
>>> callable(foo)
True
>>> callable(foo())
False
>>> callable(foo)
True
>>> callable(foo())
False
D'oh!
Comment
James Gray -
3rd April 2005
[«« Reply to this]
According to PEP 3000 the callable built-in function is going to be gone in Python 3.0. In the interest of staying compatible you may want to stick with the old way or call it and catch the exception as the previous comment mentioned. (PEP 3000 - http://www.python.org/peps/pep-3000.html)
Often it pays not to get fancy...
According to PEP 3000 the callable built-in function is going to be gone in Python 3.0. In the interest of staying compatible you may want to stick with the old way or call it and catch the exception as the previous comment mentioned. (PEP 3000 - http://www.python.org/peps/pep-3000.html)
Often it pays not to get fancy...
Eeswar Ravi -
10th January 2009
[«« Reply to this]
Good discovery. It helped you.
I tried callable(iter) and callable(candygram.link)
both returned true.....ya I was lazy to write a callable.
Good discovery. It helped you.
I tried callable(iter) and callable(candygram.link)
both returned true.....ya I was lazy to write a callable.
Anonymous -
28th July 2009
[«« Reply to this]
"the callable built-in function is going to be gone in Python 3.0"
in that case, hasattr(foo, '__call__') seems more logical (to a second hand reader) than catching the exception, in my opinion..
"the callable built-in function is going to be gone in Python 3.0"
in that case, hasattr(foo, '__call__') seems more logical (to a second hand reader) than catching the exception, in my opinion..


probably the best way (if you can afford to wait until the last possible moment) is to try making the call and catch the TypeError exception
I prefer not to use try and except statements. They look too wild and don't give any performance improvement.
Except for callables which might trigger nuclear weapons.