Last weekend I installed a Wattvision ("real-time energy monitoring sensors") in my house. It's so you can measure how much electricty your house is using. In real-time.
So it comes in two parts:
1) A camera sensor that is attached to the electricty meter. It stares at the rotating disk all day.
2) A little router/sensor thing that is connected to the camera and connects, by Wi-Fi, to your home router.
Then, the little router/sensor sends all your measurments to wattvision.com's servers. After that, I sign in to Wattvision (using my Google account) and there I can get all the statitics about my house electricity. Simple, ah?
Wattvision started as a Kickstarter project two years ago and since I sponsorered that project they sent me a kit now that it's fully tested and working. Yay!
The installation was almost jokingly simple to set up! It had that lovely "just works" feeling to it. The only challenging part was to pull the sensor wire from the corner of the house to a good spot in our basement. My wife, who is much shorter than me, crawled under our crawl-space and helped me hook it all up. I was just so impressed with the instructions. They were very well written.
Now that it's set up, you get all your statistics and graphs by signing in to wattvision.com and it works great on mobile as well. I have to admit, at this point, I really haven't understood what it all does and what it all means. Besides, because I only installed it a week ago, I don't yet have enough data to compare current usage with historic usage. By the way, you can download your data in CSV form too.
The sexiest feature is to be able to sit and watch your graph and then you deliberately switch something on in the house and you can see the graph "spike". Obviously the height of the spike depends on what you're switching on. For example, an LED light I don't even think it registers (admittedly, haven't tested that yet).
I think this is the key reason to have Wattvision; to get an insight into what in your household causes the most energy consumption. Having said that, we're not going to stop taking showers.
I don't know if I'll be checking back into the statistics very often. The novelty might just wear off after a while. We'll see.
I'm now off by about two months but in June 2003 I posted my first ever blog post.
My first website was launched in 1997 but that one is long lost. The next version, which actually used a database and a real web framework was launched in 2001 and this is the oldest screenshot I could find.
Back then the site was built in Zope which at the time was the coolest shit you could possibly use. Back in 2003 I was renting a room in an apartment in London when I was studying at City University. The broad band (american's know this as DSL) we had had a static IP address so I could tie my domain name directly to my bedroom basically. If you're born in the nineties or anything sooner you wouldn't remember this but for almost 20 years you could either buy a laptop (small but slow) or a stationary computer (clunky but fast) and this laptop I was running on was no exception. Not to mention it was an abandonned laptop too. I think it had about 8 MB of RAM. I ran a stripped down version of Debian on it without any graphical interface. I managed the code by scp'ing files into it from my Windows computer.
Back in 2003 blogging was getting hotter than celebrity spotting and I was very much interested in something that later became called "SEO" and the rumor at the time was that "blogs" got penalized by Google because blogs usually just re-posted stuff from real web pages. So I decided to prefix all my content with the word "plog". It's was a mix of "p" for Peter and sufficiently different from the word "blog".
In the first couple of years of blogging I would blog about all sorts of stuff that caught my interested. Not just genuine thoughts or real technology notes but any fun link I came across. That became a massive trend later (and still is I guess) by the giants like Digg and Reddit so I stopped doing that with my own blog. In the last 7 years (give or take) I only blog about things that are genuinely close to heart or something I've actually worked on.
Total number of blog posts: 949
Total number of approved blog comments: 8,086
Number of email addresses collected: 4,292
Maximum number of comments on any one post: 2,749
Number of Cease or Desist letters received: 1
To me, blogging used to be a form of shouting out to the world what I found interesting in the hope that you'll also find it interesting and that you'll thank me for finding that. Now it's a way for me of either documenting something I've learned recently or some other announcement that is related to what I do on some technical thing.
I wonder how this will change for me in the next 10 years.
I've put all the static resources behind this site now on AWS CloudFront For example this: http://static.peterbe.com/misc_/Peterbecom/home/grey_face.1282513695.png
This site doesn't really have much traffic. About 50,000 pageviews per month. The bill for the last month: $0.55
I think I can afford that :)
What makes my website slow? DNS
23 October 2009
This site, Linux
Pagetest web page performance test is a great tool for doing what Firebug does but not in your browser. Pagetest can do repeated tests to iron out any outliers. An alternative is Pingdom tools which has some nifty sorting functions but is generally the same thing.
So I ran the homepage of my website on it and concluded that: Wow! Half the time is spent on DNS lookup!
The server it sits on is located here in London, UK and the Pagetest test was made from a server also here in the UK. Needless to say, I was disappointed. Is there anything I can do about that? I've spent so much time configuring Squid, Varnish and Nginx and yet the biggest chunk is DNS lookup.
In a pseudo-optimistic fashion I'm hoping it's because I've made the site so fast that this is what's left when you've done all you can do. I'm hoping to learn some more about this "dilemma" without having to read any lengthy manuals. Pointers welcomed.
Every week I get an email via this website from someone who wants me to help them hack something. I've written things about the subject "hacking" but that doesn't make me a hacker. I'm not a hacker. Here's this week's nutter email I got:
im suraj from India.
Actually i want to b a computer expert.There must b nothin wth the coputer tht i cant do.so i think it can b done only wth a hacker.So can u plz help me wth this.pPleae tel me wht i hav to learn.
Does that make any sense?
Yesterday I got another one of these:
dear sir, yesterday some body stolen my cell cell number 9848133384 please search for the same and freeze my account so that no body can use it thank you yours faithfully kgdeekshitulu
It seems that a lot of people in India lose their mobile phones these days and that a lot of people in India think that by emailing me about it that I can do something about it.
I'm just a blogger. I don't have a machine that can cancel mobile SIMs.
I've recently registered now set up a new domain name for this website. It's peterbe.mobi and is there to the be mobile version of the pages.
I've also made some of these slight improvements to the css for mobile and removed the category images on the blog items. There is so much more that I can do but I just haven't had time. For example, there's no search on the mobile version.
The screenshot here to the right is from a Firefox extension I have called "Small Screen Rendering" which is useful if you want to get a guessimate look of how your page might appear in browser with a very small screen. Immediate conclusion: there's a hell of a lot of scrolling :)
Photos from FWC China 2005
27 January 2006
Photos, This site
I've now finally uploaded all my photos from the trip to China.
From 1,000 huge jpegs (at 1.6Gb) down to 300 resized ones (at 43Mb) it took quite a long time to rotate, chose, colour modify and title. To do it I had to use digikam which is the best photo album organiser program available on Linux. Even though it's the best I've found so far it still sucks. It's frustrating when you have lots to do but it's free and works better than nothing and I haven't donated any money to it.
As you might have noticed I have had to reduce the image quality quite a bit especially of the thumbnails. Sorry about this but I see thumbnails as navigation, not the real content. If you want higher resolution images I might be able to get you the original JPG if you ask kindly for it.
At the time of writing, if you do any of these searches on google:
...you'll notice two patterns:
- My site is no. 1 on all three
- They're all badly spelled
I noticed this because these are referals from my logs that I've backtracked and listed. In all cases it's unintentional misspellings either by myself or people commenting within the pages. If it wasn't for these "double misstakes" certain people who never have reached my site. You can't control how bad people spell (especially when it comes to names) but you can control your own content.
In the case of 7 wounders of the world I could have delberately included a spelling misstake of "wounders" to catch both those who can spell and those who can't, thus increasing your reach via Google.
Personally I think you should, as a web master/content developer, avoid as many misspellings as possible and not try any cheap tricks but perhaps in some extreme cases, this phenomena can turn to your own advantage. Interesting.